Comments on: Blocked Technology Ammonia as Fuel

By: StandUp555

StandUp555 — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:25:00 +0000

Thx for the info … great service to us all.

By: cpswyl2

cpswyl2 — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:31:33 +0000

NH3 must be right up there with the wheel as far as patentability/alternative source of fuel is concerned. Im staggered

By: gck82s

gck82s — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:01:35 +0000

I have been watching you for awhile you have good info NH3 Technology is alot better than H ,clean ,safe ,environmentally sound , easy, cheap ,= blocked not carbon based so hard to tax ,BIG oil Lieing BASTARDS

By: robdham99

robdham99 — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:52:23 +0000

If this is a viable idea why isn’t he running this car or implementing this on a currant or smaller model car.

By: eurogoldexchange

eurogoldexchange — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:52:07 +0000

Maybe he is. That is the point of telling people this technology is being blocked. Pigfarms produce massive amounts of ammonia they have to pay for to get rid of. 25% of the manure dumped into the ground is ammonia. Ammonia fuel cells have been build an tested and have real advantages over hydrogen. Break this info block and you’ll be paying less carbon tax…

By: 1mealperday

1mealperday — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:18:08 +0000

my HERO! Thanks for your time energy and courage.

By: galikazoid

galikazoid — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:27:26 +0000

thanks for bringing this to our attention

By: 1urbandevil

1urbandevil — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:13:36 +0000

hahaha…nice work man!!

By: ozwasp

ozwasp — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:56:22 +0000

I would say you would get Nitrous Oxide and water forming.

By: eurogoldexchange

eurogoldexchange — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:26:16 +0000

eh, nope, n2 +h20 and a few ppm no, less than the 505 ppm allowed..